News
26 May 2022

EPAM Attorneys Advised Commercial Metals Company During the Acquisition of TAC Acquisition Corp. (“Tensar”)

EPAM advised on the Russian aspects of the USD550m acquisition of Tensar – a portfolio company of Castle Harlan Inc.'s funds, and the world-leader in the manufacture and supply of retaining walls, ground stabilisation and soil reinforcement solutions across 80 national markets – by Commercial Metals Company, US steel and metal manufacturer. The transaction was multi-jurisdictional and included Tensar companies in the US, Europe, China, Russia.

9 September 2021

Attorneys of EPAM Advise Burt Intelligence on Purchase of Russian Intelligence Platform

Attorneys of EPAM provided comprehensive legal support to the Swedish IT company Burt Intelligence on their purchase of shares in the Russian intelligence platform Inventale.

28 October 2020

EPAM Advised TA Associates, a Global Investment Group With the Acquisition of Netwrix Corporation, an International IT Security Software Company

EPAM Competition Law Practice Team successfully obtained FAS approval for acquisition of Netwrix Corporation.

31 August 2020

EPAM Acts as Legal Advisor to DynaEnergetics in Complex Project on Exiting its Russian Business

EPAM provided legal support to DynaEnergetics, a world leader in the manufacturing and selling of oilfield equipment, in a complex project on closing its plant and selling its subsidiary in the Tyumen region of Russia.

23 July 2020

Anna Ivanova on the Working Group for the Draft Law on Remote Work With the State Duma Committee on Labor, Social Policy and Veterans’ Affairs

On July 15, 2020, the State Duma Committee on Labor, Social Policy and Veterans’ Affairs made a decision to establish a working group to prepare a draft law on remote work* which Anna Ivanova – Head of Employment Practice at EPAM – will join.

8 November 2013

EPAM defended the First Deputy Head of the Republic of Karelia in labour dispute

EPAM has successfully defended the interests of Alexander Chazhengin, the First Deputy Head of the Republic of Karelia proving that his rights had been infringed and that the opponent, i.e. the Government of the Republic of Karelia, was to comply with the court decision reinstalling Chazhengin to his earlier position.